Several states call for tighter restrictions on SNAP benefits
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — A growing number of states are calling on the federal government to tighten restrictions on what items can be purchased with food stamps, aiming to promote healthier eating habits among low-income Americans.
Governors in Indiana, Arkansas and West Virginia are leading the charge, asking the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to restrict the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for items such as soda, candy and other junk food.
“The health crisis is not a partisan issue,” said U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins. “And spending taxpayer dollars wisely is not, hopefully, a partisan issue.”
Supporters of the move argue it’s about promoting better nutrition and reducing long-term health care costs. Critics, however, say it restricts personal choice and stigmatizes low-income families.
“If those families want to spend money on that junk food, that’s their choice,” Rollins added. “But taxpayer dollars should be spent more responsibly.”
Despite calls for reform, questions remain about whether banning certain foods will actually improve health outcomes.
Rollins pointed to the significant cost of the program.
“Of the $110 billion that we spend on food stamps—not all nutrition programs, but just food stamps—the biggest cost-driver is sugary drinks.”
Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans are taking a different approach—targeting who uses SNAP. The latest version of the “Big Beautiful Bill Act” includes expanded work requirements for certain recipients.
Rob Rodgers, with Volunteers of America, a group that works with disadvantaged communities, voiced concerns over the changes—especially in rural areas.
“I’m concerned about any changes involving children and food programs, because that is significant down here, especially in the rural areas of Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi,” Rodgers said.
The Senate is expected to begin work on the bill when Congress returns next week.
